A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions
Identifieur interne : 004337 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004336; suivant : 004338A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions
Auteurs : A A Al-Ekrish [Arabie saoudite] ; M. Ekram [Égypte]Source :
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology [ 0250-832X ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse de variance, Biais de l'observateur, Cadavre, Humains, Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Statistique non paramétrique, Tomodensitométrie (), Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique, Écrans renforçateurs de rayons X.
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reliability of linear measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from 16-row multidetector CT (MDCT) images and cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired using a flat panel detector (FPD) with a large field of view (FOV), both independently and in comparison with each other.
Edentulous areas of human dry skulls were marked with gutta-percha markers to standardize the plane of the transverse cross-sections and path of measurements. The skulls were imaged using a 16-row MDCT scanner and a CBCT device with a large FOV and a FPD. Ridge dimensions were recorded from reformatted sections by two observers and compared with measurements recorded directly from the bone. The measurement errors and intra and interexaminer reliability were calculated for each modality and compared with each other.
The overall mean of the absolute errors was 0.75 mm for MDCT and 0.49 mm for CBCT. The mean of the CBCT absolute errors was smaller than that of the MDCT absolute errors for the overall data, as well as for the site-specific data. The intraexaminer reliability score was 0.994 for MDCT and 0.995 for CBCT. The interexaminer reliability was 0.985 for MDCT and 0.958 for CBCT.
Both MDCT and CBCT were associated with a clinically and statistically significant measurement error. CBCT measurements were significantly more accurate than those of MDCT. The measurements recorded from both modalities had a high inter and intraexaminer reliability. Accuracy of measurements was found to be more operator dependent with CBCT than with MDCT.
Url:
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065
PubMed: 21239568
PubMed Central: 3520306
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 002288
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 002288
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 002264
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001673
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001673
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001673
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 003399
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 003399
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 003399
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 004364
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004337
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions</title><author><name sortKey="Al Ekrish, A A" sort="Al Ekrish, A A" uniqKey="Al Ekrish A" first="A A" last="Al-Ekrish">A A Al-Ekrish</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Arabie saoudite</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>King Saud University</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ekram, M" sort="Ekram, M" uniqKey="Ekram M" first="M" last="Ekram">M. Ekram</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt</addr-line></nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Égypte</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cairo University</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">21239568</idno><idno type="pmc">3520306</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520306</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3520306</idno><idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr/27546065</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002288</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002288</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002288</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002288</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002264</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002264</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001673</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003399</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">003399</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">003399</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0250-832X:2011:Al Ekrish A:a:comparative:study</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004364</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004337</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004337</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions</title><author><name sortKey="Al Ekrish, A A" sort="Al Ekrish, A A" uniqKey="Al Ekrish A" first="A A" last="Al-Ekrish">A A Al-Ekrish</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Arabie saoudite</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>King Saud University</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ekram, M" sort="Ekram, M" uniqKey="Ekram M" first="M" last="Ekram">M. Ekram</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt</addr-line></nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Égypte</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Cairo University</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1476-542X</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Observer Variation</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods)</term><term>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Biais de l'observateur</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie ()</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term><term>Écrans renforçateurs de rayons X</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term><term>Observer Variation</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Biais de l'observateur</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Humains</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term><term>Écrans renforçateurs de rayons X</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Objectives</title><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reliability of linear measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from 16-row multidetector CT (MDCT) images and cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired using a flat panel detector (FPD) with a large field of view (FOV), both independently and in comparison with each other.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Edentulous areas of human dry skulls were marked with gutta-percha markers to standardize the plane of the transverse cross-sections and path of measurements. The skulls were imaged using a 16-row MDCT scanner and a CBCT device with a large FOV and a FPD. Ridge dimensions were recorded from reformatted sections by two observers and compared with measurements recorded directly from the bone. The measurement errors and intra and interexaminer reliability were calculated for each modality and compared with each other.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The overall mean of the absolute errors was 0.75 mm for MDCT and 0.49 mm for CBCT. The mean of the CBCT absolute errors was smaller than that of the MDCT absolute errors for the overall data, as well as for the site-specific data. The intraexaminer reliability score was 0.994 for MDCT and 0.995 for CBCT. The interexaminer reliability was 0.985 for MDCT and 0.958 for CBCT.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Both MDCT and CBCT were associated with a clinically and statistically significant measurement error. CBCT measurements were significantly more accurate than those of MDCT. The measurements recorded from both modalities had a high inter and intraexaminer reliability. Accuracy of measurements was found to be more operator dependent with CBCT than with MDCT.</p></sec></div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Arabie saoudite</li><li>Égypte</li></country></list><tree><country name="Arabie saoudite"><noRegion><name sortKey="Al Ekrish, A A" sort="Al Ekrish, A A" uniqKey="Al Ekrish A" first="A A" last="Al-Ekrish">A A Al-Ekrish</name></noRegion></country><country name="Égypte"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ekram, M" sort="Ekram, M" uniqKey="Ekram M" first="M" last="Ekram">M. Ekram</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004337 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004337 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:3520306
|texte= A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21239568" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |